People who want to migrate to a country , do so because they want to Essay

People who trust to migrate to a country , do so because they want to live that countrys lifestyle and culture - they should assimilate and fit in or leave - Essay ExampleIn other words migrants are to typesetters case a dilemma and either assimilate and fir in new community or just leave and get back home to the old(a) one. In the period between 1950 and 1965 thousands of Dutch migrants came to raw(a) Zealand with poor English language skills and around 10 per cent of them got back home because they failed to assimilate and fancy new language (Crezee, 2012). On the other hand, some researchers believe that behavior patterns incidental to a certain culture are the result of individual alternative (Wallendorf, & Reilly, 1983). Certainly, in case migrant fail to assimilate and respect the lifestyle of the new community that they have chosen to be their home, there is a upright possibility such migrants are not going to become successful members of such community and might as wel l be driven surface of it. According to Dustmann, the feeling of national identity and family context influence the integration ability of migrants more than any other factors (37). If a migrant is not urinate to accept a new lifestyle and fit in different cultural context, he or she is most likely to fail in legal injury of assimilation. Thus, social integration is more important than economic integration. The ability to socialize in new environment and acquire new friends is also an important experimental condition for successful assimilation of a migrant (Facchini, Patacchini, & Steinhardt, 2014). All in all, assimilation is the most important factor within the process of successful integration of migrants. failure to integrate into a new community is predefined by the inability to get assimilated culturally and socially.Crezee, I. (2012). Language shift and host society attitudes Dutch migrants who arrived in New Zealand between 1950 and 1965. International Journal of Biling ualism 16.4 (2012) 528-540. The British Psychological